| 1411 subscribers | |||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Issue No 140 March 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
FEATURE STORIES: 1. Heritage Conservation Districts and the Port Dalhousie OMB Decision IN THIS ISSUE: EVENTS submit an event 1. Heritage Conservation Districts and the Port Dalhousie OMB Decision NEWS | ACTION submit a news or action item 5. Preserving Ontario's Heritage Schools LINKS submit a link 9. St. Catharine's Standard:Port Dalhousie - Two Calls for OMB Review SUPPORT 34. Support Built Heritage News
CONTACT
|
||||||||||
| EVENTS : Issue No 140 March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
1. Heritage Conservation Districts and the Port Dalhousie OMB Decision
Community Heritage Ontario and Architectural Conservancy of Ontario invite you to attend a forum on the implications of the Ontario Municipal Board decision with regard to a proposed building project in the Port Dalhousie Heritage Conservation District. There is ample parking in the fort’s parking area to the west of the fort accessed from Fleet Street via either Garrison Road or Fort York Road west of Bathurst Street in Toronto. The decision has raised a number of issues for the management of existing heritage conservation districts, for the existing plans guiding their development and for the writing of such HCD plans in future. The purpose of the forum is not only to examine the issues, but also to look at what has to be done within the existing legislation to address the problems and at what changes may be needed in both municipal and provincial policies. Among the speakers will be Jane Pepino, a well-regarded municipal lawyer, Wayne Morgan, the heritage planner who worked with the Port Dalhousie community group and Prof. Robert Shipley from the University of Waterloo who will be speaking about his research on the effectiveness of HCDs as preservation tools. The registration fee is $30.00 payable by cheque and will cover both welcome coffee etc. and a light lunch on site. To download registration form go to:
Editor's Note: For blog discussion of the issue go to: http://lloydalter.typepad.com/port_dalhousie/ |
|||||||||||
2. Ontario Heritage Conference
Heritage in Creative Communities examines the nexus of a communitys culture and creativity with its heritage. The conference considers the way in which heritage preservation complements the production of arts and culture, all of which, in turn, fuels the new creative economy. This conference is sure to be both an enlightening and an entertaining event as delegates, surrounded by Peterboroughs rich heritage and immersed in its vibrant cultural community, explore new ideas about what our past means for our future.
|
|||||||||||
Cultural Landscapes
|
|||||||||||
4. Old Home Expo
Presented by Edifice Old Home Magazine, the Old Home Expo will feature traditional home products that are complementary to the character and integrity of heritage homes in Canada.
|
|||||||||||
| NEWS | ACTION : Issue No 140 March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
|
|
5. Preserving Ontario's Heritage Schools
In late February people gathered from all across Ontario to discuss how to prevent the loss of Ontario’s heritage school buildings. The event took place in the common room of Kensington Market Lofts, which is the site of the former George Brown College. The complex was abandoned for educational purposes in the early 1990’s but through community effort was preserved as private residences. At the end of the day a tour of the building and one suite was provided. Regrettably, both representatives from the Ministry of Education and the Toronto Catholic School Board who had been expected to attend to answer questions withdrew at the last minute, leaving organizers in a quandary as to whether or not to cancel. Fortunately, there were others who did appear making it a worthwhile educational event, as well as a chance to develop some strategy ideas. Contact information was collected so that those who participated could continue to share information. The event was jointly organized by two organizations, the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario and Community Heritage Ontario. People came from Caledon, Port Hope, Brighton, some came from as far away as Thunder Bay. Bob Saunders of CHO opened the event and presented a paper on why schools are being lost. Buildings are suffering from deferred maintenance, leading to them being declared “prohibitive to repair”. The formulas favour new construction over restoration even when costs are equivalent. As well school boards are consolidating schools into larger facilities requiring bussing for students who had been able to walk to school beforehand. Not wanting to interfere in another part of government activities, there is some hesitation to designate historic schools, and many school boards have a policy of objecting when designation is suggested. Nonetheless designating a property is an important way for the broader community to have a say about the future of a community landmark when it is threatened, and to ensure that if it is not to be used as a school, that it can at least be recycled. Bob’s paper will be published in full in CHO news, and possibly in Acorn. Architect Kim Storey spoke about the importance of school yards as part of a community’s public open space system. We tend not to think of school yards as part of our park system, but in many communities they serve more than one role. She noted that it is important for communities to fight the loss of this publicly owned land, to find ways to make schoolyards more public at the same time ensuring safety for pupils. The practice of selling off redundant school sites is short sighted, that no one can adequately predict future demographics and once a site in a community is lost it is very difficult to replace. Kim pointed to an emerging situtation in Detroit where the city is hoping to revive neighbourhoods abandoned during the flight to the suburbs in the 1950’s and 60’s. One of the key obstacles to community revival is the difficulty in re-establishing schools in areas where the lands have been sold off. She suggested short term strategies such as renting out redundant schools in whole or in part to preserve the facilities for future use. Generally, redundant schools are offered to other public institutions first. That does not always guarantee the future of the buildings, as sometimes the land is purchased but the building replaced by the new owner. However when a school is put on the open market developers snap them up for adaptive re-use. Developer Alex Spiegel has converted two schools for condominium purposes, one was the Kensington Market Lofts, the second was Lorretto Abbey on Brunswick Avenue in Toronto. He commented that renovating existing buildings is challenging but costs about the same as building new. However “the quality of the finished product is much higher and far more marketable in a historic building.” “People love to live in school buildings, we could never afford to provide the high ceilings, big windows, and generous public areas in a new building.” Interestingly, the school building may be taller than adjacent housing, but communities are generally very supportive of keeping the school building even when they might object to a new building of similar scale in their midst.
|
||||||||||
|
|
6. PROUD Requests OMB Review of Port Dalhousie Decision
MEDIA ANNOUNCEMENT
Editor's Note: All over the province people are worried that unwanted development can be forced into Heritage Conservation Districts, if you are one of them write to the chair of the OMB with your concern, and to your MPP, to the Premier and to the Minister of Culture. |
||||||||||
7. 2009 RAIC Gold Medalists-John and Patricia Patkau
In 1996, Patkau Architects was selected to represent Canada at the Venice Biennale. In March of 2009, Patricia will be awarded the 2009 Tau Sigma Delta Gold medal for exemplary commitment to architectural education and to the practice of architecture.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
8. Letter to the Editor re: The Grange
I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate the balanced review of The Grange and the member’s lounge. I think you laid out the process fairly and accurately. Historically, there are a couple of mistakes. The house was built by D’Arcy jr. who was a merchant and minor government bureaucrat. When he died it passed to his wife Sarah Anne who deeded it as part of a marriage settlement to William’s (not Henry) wife Harriette Dixon. It was Harriette who donated the house as it was in her name not Goldwin Smiths. Mary Alice Stuart chaired the restoration committee but it was Peter [Stokes] and Jeanne Minhinnick who did the restoration. Although the house was always awkward to get to, we haven’t had basement only access since 1990 with the building of the Atrium in Stage III. We are also doing a very interesting historic programme in the house, so there is more going on than just the member’s lounge.
Editor's Note: Thanks for the corrections. |
||||||||||
| LINKS : Issue No 140 March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
9. St. Catharine's Standard:Port Dalhousie - Two Calls for OMB Review Citizens group calls for review of Port tower OMB decision
Citizens’ group calls for review of Port tower OMB decision A citizens’ group is hoping it’s got one last chance to stop a development plan to revamp Port Dalhousie. PROUD (Port Realizing Our Unique Distinction) filed paperwork Friday asking the Ontario Municipal Board to review its decision last month to approve the Port Place proposal. “There are just huge stakes for heritage in Ontario. We must have the correct interpretation of the Ontario Heritage Act,” PROUD executive vice-president Carlos Garcia said. After a marathon hearing that wrapped up in November, hearing chair Susan Campbell ruled Feb. 26 that the Port Dalhousie Vitalization Corp. (PDVC) can go ahead and overhaul the community’s commercial core with an 80-unit, 17-storey condominium tower overlooking the waterfront, a 70-room hotel, 415-seat theatre and a retail centre. PROUD and the City of St. Catharines had argued that heritage district guidelines for Port Dalhousie constituted a heritage plan for the area, making it improper for the city to approve zoning and bylaw changes to permit a multi-storey condo tower.
|
|||||||||||
10. Guelph Mercury: OMB Decision in Port Goes against Democracy Who speaks for the people?
In brief, the OMB approved the development because the Port Place development project "is attractive and a desirable boost to the commercial core of Port Dalhousie and the overall city. . . . The future of the city does not hinge on one project but this project could be another significant step toward a city that builds on its assets to create a better future for the overall community." PROUD (Port Realizing Our Unique Design), a local citizens' volunteer group in Port Dalhousie, says on its website (www.saveport.ca): "We support appropriate development that is consistent with applicable regulations and will not unduly restrict access by all residents or negatively impact traffic and parking. A development that preserves the 'village feel' and historic character will truly revitalize Port Dalhousie and generate major economic benefits for our city and region." The OMB said in its decision: "Public opinion as expressed in the heat of municipal elections or passionately contested board hearings is not necessarily synonymous with public interest." This statement clearly demonstrates the OMB's rejection not only of local public opinion, but of municipal democracy.
Editor's Note: If you want to read the full text you will have to pay. |
|||||||||||
|
|
11. Hamilton Spectator: Marble removal begins, Hamilton City Hall City Hall shedding its skin
City Hall is stripping down today. Contractors started to take off the building’s marble exterior with a crow bar just before 10 a.m. Many of the large slabs shattered when removed, confirming the material is past its lifespan, said Gerry Davis, acting head of public works. “It’s very brittle,” he said as he watched crews work this morning. If the city had tried to reuse the material, Davis estimates nearly 70 per cent would have been ruined. The material is now the property of the demolition company. Davis said given the marble’s poor condition he doesn’t expect it will be reused. The contractor hopes to start install the building new concrete exterior in June. City Hall’s curtain wall of windows will come down next week, allowing residents to see inside the gutted building. The $74 million renovation is expected to be done by July 2010.
|
||||||||||
12. Globe and Mail:Efforts to Save PoW Site in Bowmanville Fire rekindles bid to mark historic PoW site
A secretive prisoner of war camp in small-town Ontario was the last place Jack Garnett wanted to be on Thanksgiving weekend, 1942. His family and fiancée were eagerly awaiting his final home leave in Port Hope, but the 22-year-old private was instead standing guard outside Camp 30, a collection of low-slung buildings that housed the highest-ranking German officers in Allied hands. The inmates had taken control of the facility and the three-day Battle of Bowmanville was on. Sixty-seven years later, the storied saga of Camp 30 threatens to die in the ashes of a weekend fire that consumed one building and damaged another.
Editor's Note: ACO will be writing to the Minister of Culture asking for support for the local endeavours to preserve this important site. To learn more go to http:/www.camp-x.com |
|||||||||||
Learn More about this Important Historic Site
Historian and local municipal councillor Lynn Hodgson has set up this website with information about Camp X. The site is listed, not designated and will be the subject of a rezoning application for redevelopment. The owner wants to demolish the existing buildings. There is fear of further arson, and no guards in place to prevent such an occurrence.
Editor's Note: Fascinating website with huge amounts of info, and a photo of OO7's modified Aston Martin on the site. |
|||||||||||
14. Newsdurhamregion.com: Suspicious fire at historic Training School for Boys - Fire guts classroom building
The former prisoner of war camp has been the centre of debate recently.
|
|||||||||||
15. Centretown Newsonline.ca: Somerset House development put on ice Marion Warnica
Plans to restore Somerset House heritage building which partially collapsed in late 2007 are crumbling as owners temporarily abandon attempts to get a building permit.
|
|||||||||||
16. CKWS News Brockville: BROCKVILLE HERITAGE:THE OLDEST STONE BUILDING IN BROCKVILLE HAS SEEN BETTER DAYS.
THE OLDEST STONE BUILDING IN BROCKVILLE HAS SEEN BETTER DAYS.
|
|||||||||||
17. London Free Press: Antiquities Shoppe tops endangered list
Older than many wares you can buy inside it, a London antique store has a dubious new distinction -- it's cracked the annual list of endangered heritage properties in the city.
|
|||||||||||
18. London Free Press: Owner pushes for Elgin County building to house all St. Thomas courts - Fate of historic facility remains up in the air
Does the historic Elgin County courthouse have a new lease on life?
|
|||||||||||
19. Northumberlandtoday.com: Letter to the Editor re:Port Hope Town Hall/Pier Project Heritage preservation a battlefield
Heritage preservation a battlefield Last evening I went by road around the Port Hope Town Hall. It is a handsome heritage building and it is meant to stand alone. To put a "big-box store addition" at the back or side connected to the main Town Hall block by an umbilical chord would be a sacrilege or even an abomination. I have yet to hear a positive statement from citizens on the concept. One important comment emerged. Is the collecting of all municipal offices in one place meant to help the ordinary citizen or is it to make life easier for the town's elected officials and municipal workers, especially in view of the recession that is on us at this time? I would hazard a guess that the average homeowner will be asked to pay a good part of the $12-million price tag. One lady e-mailed me some interesting suggestions: Why not move the entire town hall and all the departments to the buildings on the pier? They would have plenty of room. The existing Town Hall could be put to other uses. There is no place in Port Hope large enough for a good percentage of the community to fit into. Galas could be held there, such as the annual one held to benefit Northumberland Hills Hospital. The municipality could rent the spaces out for weddings and conventions. The lady also suggested, if the "big box" goes ahead, it would be a good idea to recycle the windows and bricks from the one pier building that has to come down to "give a nod to our industrial past." A professional gentleman spoke to me and suggested the attic space of the present Town Hall could be turned into useful office space. Then, there have been the suggestions concerning the former public utilities building at the foot of Walton Street, or the former waterworks building on Augusta. The architect originally intended that building to have a second floor and space was left on the lot to extend that building. A Cameco official told me the cost of demolishing the old buildings on the pier has been estimated and it would cost more to tear them down than to repair them. I have always believed in democratic government. Two episodes at our municipal level in the last year have greatly strained my beliefs. The fact is the actual rules of democratic procedure have been used but the spirit of democracy has been trampled on. One incident happened this year. The Pier Group and supporters, 300 strong, made an extensive report, paid for by the Port Hope Branch of the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario, on the history and condition of the three industrial buildings still left standing on the Port Hope waterfront. The chair thanked the spokesman and then, immediately, a motion was presented and passed to turn this report over to the Harbour Commission. A perfect way to bury an expensive and important study. The Harbour Commission consists of the whole municipal council plus a very few outsiders who can easily be outvoted. In other words, despite a strong local interest in preserving these buildings, council with its own set agenda, will pull the buildings down against the majority wish of the citizens.
|
|||||||||||
20. Ottawa Citizen: MPs on move as West Block crumbles
The federal government will convert the former Canadian Museum of Contemporary Photography in downtown Ottawa into committee rooms for MPs as part of its plan to vacate the crumbling West Block next year, the Ottawa Citizen has learned.
|
|||||||||||
21. Owen Sound Sun Times - OMB allows property split, semi-detached homes Neighbours fought westside project
Residents of an Owen Sound neighbourhood fear a recent victory by a developer will spell the end of the small-city charm of their street.
|
|||||||||||
22. Video on the Restoration of the Alton Mill, Ontario A Good News Story for a Change
An Important good news story that I am proud to say has been the major projects in my office for the past few years. The real heroes of this project are the courageous owners who took a risk on a very delapidated stone mill and have managed to ride the hills and valleys of approvals, government funding and an uncertain construction process to bring this mill back to useful life as an arts centre.This project has triggered interest in purchase and restoring other buildings in this village. Jordan and Jeremy Grant are interviewed with wonderful footage of the project interiors, before and after. As well they comment on the importance of government support in making the difference between a viable and impossible project.
|
|||||||||||
23. Waterloo Record: Facebook group hopes save Barra Castle
KITCHENER - Tari Bolt is frustrated to see a unique building in a heritage conservation district -- the Barra Castle on Queen Street South -- slowly crumble.
|
|||||||||||
24. Waterloo Record: Hearing delayed for apartment building in heritage district
KITCHENER - The long-planned move to protect the city's oldest neighbourhood from unsightly new buildings is stuck in bureaucratic limbo.
|
|||||||||||
25. Winnipeg Free Press.com Blog: Saving downtown once more
There is an excellent article by Murray McNeill in today's FP on how to encourage development in Winnipeg's downtown. I found it fascinating not because it provided a new take on an old problem - in fact, the suggestions raised by three prominent developers were pretty old news - but because it underlined the heart of the problem with Winnipeg's downtown. Namely that we've known all along how to solve the problem but we've never taken the plunge.
|
|||||||||||
26. Winnipeg Free Press: It's broke; here's how to fix it Downtown needs better incentives, developers say
One of the city's key incentive programs for stimulating new downtown housing development is "useless" and need to be quadrupled to make such projects financially attractive, according to one downtown developer.
|
|||||||||||
27. Winnipeg Free Press: The Tyndall stone lives on, the Public Safety Building may not
ABOUT 450 million years ago, whats now southern Manitoba sat at the bottom of a vast ocean teeming with marine creatures such as trilobites and brachiopods, which were sort of like crabs and scallops but didnt survive long enough to make it on to Red Lobster menus.
|
|||||||||||
28. Edmonton Journal: Latest of modern historic structures put on city list - As buildings become rapidly out of date, heritage planners make an early move
Edmonton's list of historic structures has just been modernized.
|
|||||||||||
29. Halifax Chronicle-Herald: HRMbyDesign threatens heritage in downtown
Regarding your editorial ("Heritage overreach") of March 24, the Heritage Trust of Nova Scotia is concerned that the current municipal heritage protection system in downtown Halifax is threatened by HRMbyDesign. Our alternative plan is a response to this threat.
|
|||||||||||
30. St. John Telegraph-Journal: Dexter estate seeks loss of heritage status for house
ROTHESAY - The estate of the late Val Dexter has sent a letter to the town of Rothesay requesting that the home at 37 Gondola Point Rd. be removed from the heritage preservation area.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
31. The Scotsman-Edinburgh's Caltongate Developers fail-World Heritage Status at Risk Firm's collapse leaves gaping hole in the heart of Edinburgh
A MASSIVE development at the heart of Scotland's capital was brought to a halt yesterday, after the company behind the scheme went into administration. More than 2,000 jobs had been due to be created by the Caltongate development, which would have seen a five-star hotel and conference centre, 200 new homes, office blocks, cafés and bars, and a new public square being built off the Royal Mile, close to Waverley Station. The news will trigger fears that Edinburgh will be left with another gap site for years. New housing, offices and industrial complexes were envisaged for the Phoenix Park development at Linwood, near Glasgow Airport, on a site that had lain empty for a decade. Mountgrange Capital was forced to call in the administrator, Deloitte, just weeks after it emerged the company owed £51 million to creditors. The firm made a £24 million loss last year and had put various parts of the Caltongate scheme on hold while it tried to raise the necessary finance to keep it afloat. Its directors, Martin Myers and Manish Chande, last night insisted the scheme was not dead and said they would be trying to pursue Caltongate through their own investment fund. Despite being strongly backed by Edinburgh city council and business leaders, Caltongate was one of the most controversial proposed developments in living memory in Edinburgh city centre. It triggered a vocal community campaign and was opposed by numerous bodies, including Edinburgh World Heri-tage and the Cockburn Association. Most concerns surrounded plans to demolish two listed buildings to make way for the hotel and conference centre. The development was widely blamed for triggering a Unesco investigation into Edinburgh's world heritage status.
Editor's Note: If you read down the comments below the article you will see the general public delight with the failure of this development.....Edinburgh Council seems to have lost its way. |
||||||||||
|
|
32. Place Economics: Rypkema Addresses European Parliament on Heritage and the New Economy Heritage, Environment, and Economic Stimulus
Heritage Investment: Counter Cyclical Opportunity in Economic Downturns
Thank you Dr. Gutierrez-Cortines for inviting me here for this important hearing. Europeans generally understand the components of sustainable development: environmental responsibility, economic responsibility, and social/cultural responsibility. We have known for some time that unless we make significant changes quickly, our environment is not sustainable. What we have learned in the last 120 days is that we have built our economy on foundations and assumptions that are also not sustainable. So governments have two simultaneous challenges: how to get the economy rolling again, and how to restructure our economies so that they become sustainable. Heritage conservation has a central role in responding to both of those challenges. Counter-cyclical economic strategies should be both efficient and effective. Heritage conservation meets that test with projects ready all over Europe the funding of which would put people immediately to work. Heritage conservation strategies target the construction trades - one of the industries most affected by this recession. Simultaneously, there is a shortage of craftsmen in a variety of restoration skills. So job training, job creation, and a life time profession can be encompassed within the same strategy. Those aren't just jobs. They are good, well-paying jobs, particularly for those without formal advanced education. They are not make-work jobs; they are real, productive jobs. Counter-cyclical strategies should target long term capital improvement projects. Heritage buildings are certainly capital assets but also, almost by definition, are long term in perspective -how long they have lasted already and how long they can last into the future if we protect them. Counter-cyclical strategies should create jobs and generate personal income. Heritage conservation is a labor intensive activity with 60 to 70 percent of the total expenditure on labor rather than materials. This has a significantly greater initial impact on a local economy than does new construction, but also much larger secondary impacts. Once installed, materials don't spend any more money. But the carpenter, plumber, and electrician each spend their paycheck locally on a haircut, groceries, and paying local taxes. Since this recession is world-wide, counter-cyclical strategies should have widely dispersed benefits. Because heritage buildings are spread throughout Europe and are located in both the largest cities and the smallest villages, a heritage-based strategy automatically has wide-spread benefits.
|
||||||||||
33. New York Times: Chicago Challenge to Preservation Laws Challenge to Landmark Law Worries Preservationists
CHICAGO - Carol Mrowka considers her East Village neighborhood here attractive, comfortable - and ordinary. So when the city deemed the area an official landmark, Ms. Mrowka found it absurd and went to court. "Sure, it's a nice neighborhood," said Ms. Mrowka, a real estate agent who moved 12 years ago to the neighborhood, north and west of the Loop, with its cottages and small, flat buildings that were home to immigrants in the late 1800s. "The basic style of the buildings is pretty, but this is not a landmark." Now her case has been appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court, raising alarm among preservationists about the future of scores of such landmark districts and buildings in a city that adores its architectural legacy. "The fact is, Chicago could not exist without its landmark ordinance," said Jonathan Fine, the executive director of Preservation Chicago, a nonprofit group. "It's the line that holds us back from the Neanderthals." A state appellate court sided with Ms. Mrowka and Al Hanna, a resident of Lincoln Park, another neighborhood where a section has landmark status, finding that Chicago's four-decades-old ordinance for designating landmarks used "vague, ambiguous and overly broad" terms to sort out what buildings and neighborhoods should be protected from change or demolition. The City of Chicago appealed that decision this month, and both sides are waiting to hear if the Illinois Supreme Court will take the case. City lawyers say that if the ruling stands, any of the city's landmarks - except perhaps those that are protected through separate federal or state programs - could have their protected status challenged, said Jennifer Hoyle, a spokeswoman for the city's law department.
|
|||||||||||
| SUPPORT : Issue No 140 March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
|
Cheques are payable to: |
|||||||||||
| CONTACT : Issue No 140 March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||