| 1551 subscribers | |||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Issue No 161 April 20, 2010
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
FEATURE STORIES: 1. Michael Redhill Speaks on "Consolation" IN THIS ISSUE: EVENTS submit an event 1. Michael Redhill Speaks on "Consolation" NEWS | ACTION submit a news or action item 5. Future of Views of Queen's Park LINKS submit a link 11. BlogTO: Gould Street Collapse and Demolition SUPPORT 25. Support Built Heritage News
CONTACT
|
||||||||||
| EVENTS : Issue No 161 April 20, 2010 | |||||||||||
1. Michael Redhill Speaks on "Consolation"
http://www.newtoron
|
|||||||||||
2. CONSERVATION IN CONTEXT: Changing Historical, Theoretical and Operational Perspectives
The Cultural Resource Management Program is pleased to announce the following heritage conservation course on campus from June 7 – 12, 2010. The course will be instructed by Herb Stovel, and is a core requirement for the four- course Professional Specialization Certificate in Heritage Conservation Planning offered at the University of Victoria. CONSERVATION IN CONTEXT: Changing Historical, Theoretical and Operational Perspectives
|
|||||||||||
3. Lecture: Glenn Mac Arthur - Toronto's Architectural Legacy:
For Info contact Linda McLean, 416 863 0010, or linda.mclean@heritagetrust.on.ca
|
|||||||||||
4. Nova Scotias Heritage Churches: Practical Advice on Preserving our Built Heritage
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE The Heritage Trust of Nova Scotia is sponsoring a symposium that will offer expert practical advice to Nova Scotians who are struggling to keep their heritage architecture – especially their churches – viable in changing times. Professionals with expertise in architectural preservation, engineering, history, energy conservation, and stained glass conservation will speak at Conservation of Religious Buildings and their Settings. Nova Scotia’s heritage churches form a unique historical treasure, but everywhere their survival is at risk. These building were built to answer the needs of the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries. How can these heritage sites be given new life and remain viable in the 21st?
|
|||||||||||
| NEWS | ACTION : Issue No 161 April 20, 2010 | |||||||||||
|
|
5. Future of Views of Queen's Park
All the arguments have been made, and the matter left to OMB member S.J. Stefanko to decide alone. The decision is expected to be available in about a month. The OMB has been asked by The Legislative Assembly (LA) of Ontario to reduce the height of a proposed development north of Queen’s Park at 21 Avenue Road in order to avoid further encroachment into the silhouette view of the Legislative Assembly Building, the symbol of Ontario’s democracy. The proposed development has the support of Toronto City Council, but not staff at the City of Toronto Planning, Ontario Heritage Trust or The Ministry of Culture. The Legislative Assembly is a separate entity from the political process - managing political debate, the Queen’s Park property and hosting visiting delegations, whether school children or dignitaries from other places. The Speaker of the Legislature is the head of the Legislative Assembly and is elected to this position by the other MPP’s. The Speaker must be non-partisan and acts on behalf of all MPP’s in matters affecting the L.A. He is independent of cabinet and political process. I spent more time than I could afford to last week listening to the arguments from both sides, and I should also say giving participant evidence on behalf of the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario in favour of views protection. Arguing at the OMB against a developer and a municipality who are in agreement is a mug’s game. There are almost no examples of success for such appeals. But it is also highly unusual for the Speaker of the Legislature to be a party at an OMB hearing. The Speaker did not have support from the Government in making the L.A. case. In spite of requests from the Chair of the Ontario Heritage Trust, Lincoln Alexander, and the President of the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario, Lloyd Alter, the Ministers of Municipal Affairs and Housing and Culture did not take an official position. Aileen Carroll, the previous Minister of Culture did not help the Speaker’s case by responding to the Toronto Star Editorial asking her to intervene to protect Queen's Park. “The silhouette is not pristine nor is it imperative to the heritage preservation of the Legislative Building that it be so. View shed is only one of many considerations in heritage preservation. The Legislature is well defined by the wide boulevard of University Ave. for many blocks to the south and well protected by the parkland and open portion of University Ave. to the north.” The (LA) position, argued by architects Herb Stovel, Chris Borgal, George Baird and planner John Gladki was that the views from the south, along the ceremonial progression north to Queen's Park are as important as the post card views from College Street and should not be further damaged. That implies no increase in height for this site, however it is possible to add a second tower without making matters worse. Stovel described the existing view from the vantage points northbound on University Avenue as “muddied” by the existing Four Seasons Hotel building and the Renaissance Plaza, but argued that even with that, the rest of the roof profile can still be seen clearly against sky behind, and it is important that no further encroachment be permitted. Buildings any taller than the existing would dominate the view, and diminish the presence of the seat of government. Herb Stovel went even further and said that no buildings should be seen above the roof of the L.A. from Queen Street, a position also taken in ACO’s participant evidence. That would limit development to 49.5 metres…. nearly exactly the same as the existing height limit of 46m.... Coincidence? The Speaker for the Legislature spoke with great presence, asking for preservation of the views and dignity of the Assembly. He talked about his first impressions of the processional view up University Avenue and how he had always found the existing buildings in the background, complete with commercial signage on the top, a "blight" that should never have been permitted. He emphasized how often dignitaries visit from other places. Veterans parade up the Avenue to remind us of past sacrifices. University Avenue is a civic place of public remembrance and celebration. The developer's witnesses argued that City Council supported their scheme and that it had minimal impact on the post card view from north of College Street. Architect, Michael McLelland gave heritage evidence in favour of the proposal. Mr. McLelland agreed with Aileen Carroll. He also pointed to Julian Smith’s Restoration Plan that identified views to the Legislative Assembly from the north and south as important heritage attributes, and argued that because one can see towers in the background from the north, an important view, that it was reasonable to see towers from the south, another important view. Witnesses for the L.A. were unanimous in giving significantly greater importance to the view to the front of the building. During the summation Stefanko asked the following question, “If the view from the south is so important why isn’t it more clearly protected?” That may tell us where his thoughts are going. Several witnesses pointed out the danger that approval of this proposal poses. If more towers of this height are built up Avenue Road, we will soon see no sky behind the L.A. Even if this tower goes ahead there is a need for clearer protection for this view….requiring cooperation between the province and the city. Watch this space for the OMB decision. P.S. I would be most interested to get feedback from subscribers on this question. Do you think the existing views from University Avenue should be protected? Yes or No to cnasmith@sympatico.ca I will keep a tally.
|
||||||||||
6. OMB Rules Against Developer: Saves Talbot Apartments in Toronto
A recent decision, released April 7, dismissed the appeal of Context Developments against the Toronto City Council's refusal to allow demolition and redevelopment of the Talbot Apartments on Bayview Avenue, a rental housing project. The OMB member was Marc Denhez. The Talbot apartments were not designated when the developer purchased the property. When the City became aware of the threat it designated them under the Ontario Heritage Act. The decision is long and contains several significant heritage arguments, and also refers back to how heritage matters were handled in several cases, including the recent Port Dalhousie decision. BHN will be carrying a more detailed article on the decision and its implications in an upcoming issue, but in the meantime you can look up the decision and read it for yourself. Go to the OMB website link below, and paste in the Case number, PL081065. The actual decision is the last document that appears. http://www.omb.gov.on.ca/english/eDecisions/eDecisions.html
|
|||||||||||
7. Ontario Heritage Act 5 years Out 2....Arson in Simcoe
On Good Fri am. two heritage homes located in Bradford West Gwillimbury on the 6th conc. just east of hwy 27 were set alight by unknown persons. Both farm houses were unoccupied, insecurly boarded up and owned by Geranium- Metrus Corp. The Phillips-Stoddart house, a 1/12 storey mud block. 1837 90% original both inside and out, was built by William Pen Phillips a descendant of William Penn of US. This house was one of the oldest if not the oldest house in Simcoe Co. and certainly significant provincially because of the mud block construction. It was listed on the register.and set on fire at 3:30 am. While firemen were busy with this blaze, another heritage house a few farms east, of much less significance was torched at 6am. This house, known as the Crang house was totally destroyed. This exceptional house could be restored if council is able to see past the burnt out interior. Council is very skilled at negotiating developement and planning matters with the many developers that are racing here to make their mark, on some of the best farmland north of Toronto. If they use their same negotiating skills with Geranium this unique example of a long lost building technology can be preserved. As the owner, Geranium is responsibe, partly because the building was not properly secured. If the owner continued to lease the house it would probably still be standing. The Province has downloaded this monumental heritage preservation challenge and responsibility to lower tier governments; fairly or unfairly. I think it's long past due for the Province to take some responsibility and to provide some meaningful support at the local level by sorting out planning issues and reminding the apparently untouchable elected officials that they have, in many cases, been ignoring their vital role in the preservation process. I fear by the time the Province decides to enforce the Heritage Act. as they do the planning Act. our record of preservation here in Ontario will be a total embarrassment. David Chambers Bond Head. BWG (Former heritage Comm. chair)
Editor's Note: David Chambers is suggesting that local municipalities need more guidance, and less latitude in how and what they choose to protect. While heritage can be a local matter, it is also of value to all of us. If the Province continues to allow heritage conservation to be left to the vagaries of individual municipal councils it will impact in lots of ways. The first is diminishing the experience of visiting Ontario, for residents and tourists alike...only certain places will retain their distinct charm. I would love to be able to enjoy the beauty of Ontario without having to deal with what my husband and I have labelled the blandscape, the sick ring of disposable sameness that surrounds almost every community and threatens to overwhelm. |
|||||||||||
8. 11th annual Doors Open Toronto will unlock the city
11th annual Doors Open Toronto will unlock the citys architecture on May 29 and 30
|
|||||||||||
9. Heritage Canada Foundation Marks World Heritage Day by encouraging the preservation of Canadas agricultural landmarks
OTTAWA – April 16 2010 – To mark World Heritage Day and its theme, Agricultural Heritage, the Heritage Canada Foundation (HCF) is drawing attention to some of Canada’s agricultural buildings and places. The historic pattern of farm settlements and the distinctive farm buildings in various regions across Canada are tangible features in our landscape that connect us to our agricultural heritage. Over the years, Hritage magazine has featured articles on Canada’s agricultural buildings and places: · “Barn Raisers: Heritage and the Art of Fundraising” (Vol. XII. No. 3) · “Agricultural Theatres of Saskatchewan’s Moose Mountains” (Vol. XI. No. 3) · “The Round Barns of the Eastern Townships” (Fall 2003) Many of Canada’s national historic sites relate to the country’s agricultural heritage: · The Bar U Ranch in Longwood, Alberta commemorates the history of ranching in Canada. · Grand Pré Rural Historic District in Kings County, Nova Scotia, which honours Acadian settlements and agricultural history. · Ottawa’s Central Experimental Farm, is home to the headquarters of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. World Heritage Day, also known as International Day for Monuments and Sites was created in 1982 by ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites) and endorsed by UNESCO in 1983. The Heritage Canada Foundation is a national, membership-based, non-governmental organization created in 1973 as Canada’s National Trust. For further information: Carolyn Quinn, Director of Communications, cquinn@heritagecanada.org. Telephone: 613-237-1066 ext. 229; Cell: 613-797-7206 To be removed from the mailing list, send us an email with the word “unsubscribe” in the subject box.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
10. Call for Nominations
The Heritage Toronto Awards celebrate outstanding contributions by professionals and volunteers in the promotion and conservation of Torontos history and heritage landmarks. Heritage Toronto invites the public to nominate significant 2009 projects they think should be celebrated.
|
||||||||||
| LINKS : Issue No 161 April 20, 2010 | |||||||||||
|
|
11. BlogTO: Gould Street Collapse and Demolition Kyle Rae expresses concern over Gould Street demolition
After following the coverage of the Gould Street wall collapse on Friday, I decided to make way down to 335 Yonge Street to take a look at the state of the building for myself. I was fortunate (if you can call it that) to arrive just as construction crews were tearing down a large chunk of the building's façade, apparently for safety reasons. Crews were smashing it with a large crane-like machine, and the old building looked like it was about to collapse entirely. A nearby police officer did, however, reassure me that it wouldn't and that only loose segments of the wall were in danger of falling.
|
||||||||||
12. CBC News: Old church damaged in St. Phillip's NL Anglican priest quiet about church damage
Updated Monday, April 5, 2010
|
|||||||||||
|
|
13. City Hall Marble Lines Drainage Ditch The white Cherokee marble that cladded City Hall before it was replaced with concrete now lines a drainage ditch near Book Road in Ancaster.
Graham Crawford, the owner of HIStory + HERitage on James North, has discovered the final resting place of the white Cherokee marble that previously adorned City Hall before the renovation committee decided to replace it with concrete. Its broken pieces line a drainage ditch in Ancaster.
Editor's Note: City of Hamilton staff prepared a 61 page report (http://www.hamilton.ca/Hamilton.Portal/Inc/PortalPDFs/ClerkPDFs/committee-of-the-whole/2005/May09/PD05036.pdf) recommending designation of City Hall - which Council accepted and passed as BY-LAW NO. 06-011. The Marble was mentioned no less than 20 times, and that the marble cladding on all four facades is specifically identified in the Reasons for Designation. |
||||||||||
|
|
14. Destroying Preston's Grand View School - Another Permanent Loss Looking Down The Barrel Of Demolition Once Again
I have read with interest the articles regarding the proposal by the Waterloo Region Public School Board to demolish Grand View Public School. The story repeats a familiar, worn-out scenario. Owner owns old building. Owner wants to redevelop property. Heritage advocates object. Owner pleads hardship. Council comes to the rescue of the owner and the building is demolished. As a result the community is polarized; heritage advocates are exhausted and labeled as obstructionists, living in the past and unrealistic. The City loses some of its charm, Council is seen as the protector of property rights and the long term public interest is diminished. Destroying Grand View School Why is this battle staged time and time again? Too often, our Council, and many in our city, consider our built heritage just not important enough to conserve. When weighed with other matters like re-development and even parking spaces, our built heritage becomes a casualty in the quest for our individual interests.
|
||||||||||
|
|
15. Gettysburg Times: Son of Cyclo's architect hopes it's conserved.
The son of the architect that designed the Cyclorama Center at Gettysburg National Military Park hopes a federal judge’s final ruling in a three-year court case results in the conservation of the building, opposed to its planned demolition. "I know my father in Heaven would hope that this reprise would allow the Park Service to step back and reconsider its plan, and perhaps commission us to re-purpose our building," Dion Neutra, 84, said Thursday, the day following the judge’s decision. "A whole generation of Americans who have visited this site over the years — 5,000 of which have signed our petitions — would be grateful to see their tax-dollar-paid-for structure thus saved," concluded Neutra, of Los Angeles. Neutra, who previously claimed that he would "chain himself to the building" if it was ever razed, believes the structure could be re-used as a museum and diorama for visitors to experience the battlefield landscape changes that have occurred since 1863. U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Hogan told the Park Service in a March 31st order that it must go back and reconsider its 1999 decision to raze the 48-year-old Cyclorama Center, designed by nationally-renowned architect Richard Neutra. The park planned to knock down the building, which sits atop Ziegler’s Grove near Pickett’s Charge, as part of its long-time plan to restore the 6,000-acre battlefield to its Civil War era appearance. Those plans are now likely delayed. GNMP spokeswoman Katie Lawhon referred all questions Thursday regarding Hogan’s ruling to the Department of Justice, where spokesman Andrew Ames said that they’re "reviewing the court’s decision." "No determination has been made as to the government’s next step in this matter," said Ames, explaining that there is no timetable. Hogan’s ruling in the three-year-old lawsuit to prevent the building’s demolition is final, so any appeal would have to be made through another circuit court. In Dec. 2006, Virginia-based preservation group — Recent Past Preservation Network — filed a suit to prevent the demolition, arguing that the park did not follow national environmental laws in its 1999 General Management Plan, when it decided to bulldoze the building. Twelve months ago, federal Magistrate Judge Alan Kay recommended that the U.S. District Court rule in favor of the preservation group’s suit, writing that the Park Service acted "unlawfully" when it decided to raze the old Cyclorama Center, by not evaluating alternatives. In Hogan’s ruling Wednesday, he concurred with Kay’s resolution, telling the park that it must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act. The park can still tear down the building, but it must follow procedure before arriving at that result. "It’s a big moment in historic preservation," said Christine Madrid French, the former president of the Recent Past Preservation Network. "Preservation ideas have shifted in the last decade to accommodate more of the modern buildings in American architectural history," said Madrid-French. "We’re very excited to see that the building can have a continued contribution at Gettysburg, if the Park Service can examine its future," she concluded.
|
||||||||||
16. Globe and Mail: Bay of Fundy Still in Running for 7 Wonders of Nature Bay of Fundy still in contention for seven natural wonders of the world
Riding a tide of online popularity, the Bay of Fundy is in the running to be among the New 7 Wonders of Nature. The bay dividing Nova Scotia and New Brunswick is the only Canadian place still in contention in a contest launched by a Swiss foundation. The concept is based on the Seven Wonders of the World revered by the ancients, which have mostly returned to dust. (Only the Great Pyramid of Giza still stands from the list compiled by Herodotus.) So a decade ago, the foundation launched a search for seven more, calling on people around the globe to vote for their favourites, anointing buildings and monuments from the 20th century back to before the time of Christ. Now, looking beyond human-made grandeur, the foundation is seeking to identify the seven natural wonders of the world. A total of 440 entries has been whittled to 77 and then to 28, with the Bay of Fundy a dark horse in a spectacular field ranging from the Amazon to Taipei’s Yushan. Fundy’s pitch The bay is known for its massive tidal variance: Measured at 16 metres, it is the biggest in the world. Those backing the pitch point as well to the sites of the area’s first European settlements. There have also been dinosaur finds, including the world’s smallest and Canada’s oldest, as well as three UNESCO sites and numerous species of whales spotted nearby.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
17. Ottawa Citizen: Catholic Convent at Risk When is a heritage site not a heritage site?
The argument that an area of Richmond Road should be protected doesn't wash with some backers of development. To a 10-year-old kid growing up along Ottawa's Richmond Road in 1947, "anything west of Island Park was pretty barren." "It was pretty far away. That was country," Ken Kavanat, now 73, recalls. He lived just east of Island Park Drive, at the corner of Richmond Road and Western Avenue. Back then, he says, "Richmond Road was the road to Britannia Beach. You'd take the streetcar. I don't think it was ever village-like. The only village was Westboro around Churchill to Roosevelt Avenue." Slightly west of Island Park was Hilson elementary school -- which Kavanat briefly attended -- and the convent for Les Soeurs de la Visitation d'Ottawa, built in 1864. The cloistered Catholic nuns have occupied the 51/2-acre site since 1913, but are scheduled to leave in September after the prime piece of property was sold to Ashcroft Homes for $12.7 million. Ashcroft is proposing the site be developed for mixed use, including condos, a seniors building and commercial spaces, some open areas and courtyards with public access. Underground parking would have one entrance off Richmond Road and another off Byron Avenue. It is seen as a rare opportunity for development within the Greenbelt. However, opposition at public information meetings has been loud and furious, with some arguing the plans will negatively impact the area's "village-like" roots. But Rod Lahey, architect for the project, says it's nostalgia for something that never existed. "They're trying to turn it back into something it never was," he says. "Richmond Road was basically a highway into Ottawa. It was a commercial strip. That's why you have so many used-car lots and car dealerships along there."
|
||||||||||
18. Owen Sound Sun Times: expert to study the historical significance of Alexandra Community School Board hires expert to study Alexandra's historical value
The area's public school board will pay a heritage expert to study the historical significance of Alexandra Community School in Owen Sound, but a board official says he doesn't expect it will reveal anything to warrant protecting the 1911 structure from demolition.
|
|||||||||||
19. Owen Sound Sun Times: Paisley Inn owner considers selling ARRAN-ELDERSLIE: Council to discuss building in closed session Monday
Burke Maidlow said Friday he wants to turn the Paisley Inn into artists' studios, but he's also talking to realtors about selling the building.
|
|||||||||||
20. TheRecord.com: Cambridge won't block Grand View school demolition
CAMBRIDGE — City council won’t halt demolition of Grand View public school, but still wants the Preston landmark saved for posterity. Councillors on Monday night voted 4-1 against starting the process to protect the 1923 building under the Ontario Heritage Act. Instead, Mayor Doug Craig — who voted against designation — will continue talks with school officials to find a way to save the building overlooking Hamilton Street. “I’m ever hopeful. We’re in a very short time frame here. I don’t want to get anybody’s hopes up.” The city’s heritage advisory committee wants council to stop plans to raze the building in exchange for a new and bigger $7 million school. Since it decided a month ago to proceed with demolition, the school board has publicly rebuffed city overtures to save the school. A new Grand View is planned to open in fall 2011, after which the old Grand View would be demolished.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
21. therecord.com: Tannery buildings set to be torn down without public discussion Local architect wants decision publicly debated
KITCHENER — A local architect says a group of historic downtown buildings could be demolished to make room for a gravel parking lot with no public discussion or consultation. John MacDonald wants the city to protect a group of four old industrial buildings on Joseph Street, which formed part of the Lang Tannery, before a demolition permit is issued. The tannery buildings are owned by Cadan Inc., the Toronto developer in the midst of a $30 million redevelopment of the tannery’s main building across the street. Cadan Inc. wants to level the four buildings, located at 189-204 Joseph St. and 14 Linden Ave., for more parking spaces for the commercial tenants leasing space in the main tannery building.
|
||||||||||
|
|
22. Toronto Star: Alexandra Park Redevelopment The rethinking of 'Alex Park' public housing complex
A new proposal would almost completely replace the 1960s design that helped make the downtown complex a model of public housing, but some see space for a more nuanced approach. Jerome Markson has barely crossed Dundas St. when he stops in his tracks: "Why is that silly fence there?" The fence in question, metal and roughly two metres tall, runs between the sidewalk and a little parking lot at Alexandra Park, the downtown public housing project that Markson helped design in the mid-1960s. Back then, there was no fence, but further west, there was a wall separating the street from some of the project's townhouses. Jane Jacobs, Markson recalls, always quizzed about him about that, thought the wall an unnecessary barrier. "I think I was a little afraid of having the front doors right smack along Dundas," he says. The concrete wall has since been cut to about half its original height, and a metal fence added on top of what remains, an alteration Markson finds almost as puzzling. But this is mere tinkering in the face of what might happen. For the past couple of years, residents have been busy working with Toronto Community Housing Corp., city councillor Adam Vaughan and Urban Strategies Inc. on what could become a complete overhaul of the site.
|
||||||||||
23. the Guardian / guardian.co.uk: Edinburgh faces legal action over Caltongate development European commission rules council illegally sold off area on Royal Mile at the heart of city's World Heritage site
Edinburgh council faces legal action after the European commission ruled it illegally sold land at the centre of an international row over the protection of the city's historic buildings, the Guardian can reveal. The Scottish capital has already been criticised by Unesco, the United Nations culture agency, after the council approved plans for a £300m hotel and offices development at Caltongate on the medieval Royal Mile, which lies at the heart of the city's World Heritage site. Senior council officials have been told that the European commission has decided it breached a number of European laws by selling the Caltongate site to the developer Mountgrange for £5m without putting the land – a former bus depot which sits next to Waverley station – out for sale on the open market. In a letter passed to the Guardian, an official in the internal markets directorate discloses that the commission will start infringement proceedings for breaching regulations on public procurement, as well as breaking rules on equal treatment, non-discrimination and transparency. Under European law the proceedings are formally taken against the UK government. The action follows a complaint from an architectural writer and historian, David Black, a founder of the Old Town Trust. "The mismanagement of Edinburgh is becoming quite legendary," he said.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
24. the Guardian / guardian.co.uk: Lord Foster fires up campaign to save rusting Russian radio tower Architect brands Lenin-commissioned structure as a work of 'dazzling genius' and inspiration that must be saved
From a distance it looks a bit like an upturned wastepaper basket, soaring over the concrete skyline of southern Moscow. The Russian capital's unique Soviet-era radio station was built in 1922 to spread the message of revolutionary communism around the world, but it is badly neglected and suffering from corrosion. Now British architect Lord Foster has backed a campaign to save the 150-metre-high steel tower designed by the engineering genius Vladimir Shukhov. In an open letter, Lord Foster describes the tower as "a structure of dazzling brilliance and great historical importance". Calling the structure Shukhov's masterpiece, Foster says it is the "first major landmark of the Soviet period".
Editor's Note: Lord Foster's open letter can be seen at, http://www.shukhov.org/news.html?n=63&id=1#news_63 |
||||||||||
| SUPPORT : Issue No 161 April 20, 2010 | |||||||||||
|
Cheques are payable to: |
|||||||||||
| CONTACT : Issue No 161 April 20, 2010 | |||||||||||